Skip to main content

Why I do not want to use another iOS podcast client than Castro

Castro is still pretty fresh in the iOS App Store (currently version 1.0.6, first release came in late 2013) but has already beaten the competitors in my opinion. Here is why:
  • Castro is winning by simplicity. Focusing on features and using using the fresh iOS 7 design.
  • Great simple feed search engine (worked perfect for my favorite German podcasts).
  • Push notification works.
  • It is stable.
  • Once again, I like the simple intuitive design. 
Other settled podcast player in iOS market help Castro to succeed by not fixing their issues. I am coming from Instacast and this is why I think it does not fit anymore:
  • When I open Instacast by sliding push messages on my lock screen it crashes nearly up to 50%.
  • Up Next Feature does not work for me. Lists are useless, everything works just through Up Next.
  • Sync feature with its OS X app is a mess, similar to Apple’s Podcast app.
This is why Apple’s Podcast app does not work either:
  • Sync with other iOS and OS X devices is a mess.
  • Push notification is not existing (Is it? I have never seen any).
  • Navigation is too complicated. 
By using Castro I completely discarded thinking about syncing podcasts on several devices, I am using Airplay devices like AppleTV or AirServer.

My ideas to improve Castro:

  • Add an option for continuously playing all my podcast episodes, instead of stopping after each one.
  • Add support for password protected feeds.
  • Start playing an episode immediately by opening the episode. I do not want to tap play after opening it. 
  • Integrate Airplay button in the lower control bar. 

Update:

  • Add missing sharing options to share your current podcast episode on Twitter.
  • Double Tap to play episodes immediately instead of opening it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to integrate AVM smart devices into HomeKit by using openHAB

After some evaluating openHAB (Vers. 2.2.0) on my NAS I wanted to do it right and started with this (German) article to use openHABian together with a Raspberry Pi.My primary goal was to integrate my AVM smart home devices to control them with HomeKit.

To get started I used the following items:
Raspberry PISD Card 16 GB And the following software (I used a Mac, so you might need to replace some tools if you use another OS): Download the latest openHABian image here. This is a dedicated linux distribution to provide an openHAB server.Download SD Formatter here. Needed to format your SD card.Download Etcher here. Needed to install the openHABian image on the SD card. Installation openHABianInsert the SD cardConnect the Raspberry Pi via LAN with your networkPlugin the Raspberry PiWait about 45 minutes until all updates were installedWhen everything went well you should be able to connect to http://openhabianpi:8080Connect via ssh: ssh openhabian@openhabianpi (standard password: openhabian)…

Clean up AppFabric Dashboard Part 2: Duplicate collection entry in Web.config

In Part one I have already described how to remove phantom apps here on more supplement. These phantom apps could also remain in the AppFabric Monitoring db:


Just delete no longer needed entries in this table.
Duplicate collection entry When you receive this kind of issue, like "[...] Cannot add duplicate collection entry [...]" you have defined the a configuration section twice in two different Web.config files in different places in your file system.

Clear One easy solution is to use a clear statement. Searching for the inherited element There is a post in Microsoft's documentation which is explaining how to do it. Visual Studio in debug mode When you are working with Visual Studio in debug mode, which means you are just pressing F5 to run it on your local IIS instead of publishing it to a web server, you should keep in mind that e.g. your obj folder might contain more copies of your Web.config file. This could lead into this duplicate collection issue as well.

How does AppFabric cache calculates the values for RequestCount, ReadRequestCount, WriteRequestCount and MissCount?

When I started to use the Get-CacheStatistics cmdlet to monitor caching activities more intensivley I was often confused. Here an example:


Should not be ReadCount+WriteCount = RequestCount? Why is WriteRequestCount increasing +2 although I just send one put request?

By talking to Microsoft support I figured out how AppFabric cache calculates its numbers (Thanks to Gayathri from Distributed Service Team). Number calculation behavior depends on your configuration, high availability and local cache have a major impact on it.
ActivityRequestCount ReadRequestCount WriteRequestCount MissCount DataCacheFactory is initialized and Named Cache is up +1---Put item, not yet in local and server cache+1-+1 (+2 with HA)+1Get item from local cache----Get item from server cache, local cache has expired+1+1--Get item, local and server cache has expired+1+1-+1
I hope this is helpful for you when you are analyzing the caching behavior for your application.